Run AI-native GRC and vendor risk on one platform.

Leverage AI-native agents to run GRC, manage third-party risk, and prove your security posture on one unified platform.

Built for the regulated mid-market
  • 50+
    Frameworks supported
  • 12
    AI specialist agents
  • 100%
    Audit-traceable actions
  • Unlimited
    Users · flat fee
  • 24/7
    Vendor monitoring
The platform

One AI-native platform for every part of your security program.

Internal posture, vendor posture, and questionnaire response on a single data model. Effy and the agent system surface what needs attention before it shows up on a board report.

Third-Party Risk

3-layer scoring across criticality, assessed posture, and live exposure. Posture Divergence Detection flags Severe drift first.

Tier 1 vendors247 active
AC
Acme Cloud
42Severe
HX
Helix Analytics
74Moderate
NB
Northbeam
91Compliant
Learn more

Realtime Vendor Monitoring

Continuous external scans with event-based override triggers. Drift severity tiered Minor / Moderate / Severe before alerts fire.

Live signals+3 events
24h agoNow
Learn more

AI Governance

Inventory every AI use case. Tier risk, attach policies, route high-risk approvals through the same workflow as controls.

AI use case registry12 tracked
Customer support copilot
High
Resume screening
Critical
Sales email drafting
Low
Learn more

External Questionnaire Engine

Ingest Excel, Word, PDF questionnaires. AI classifies, maps to controls, drafts cited answers, exports back to source format.

Inbound questionnaires8 active
Vanguard Security Review92%
Citi Vendor Assessment64%
Stripe SIG Lite 202638%
Learn more

Vendor Intelligence

Auto-enriched vendor profiles — funding, ownership, headcount, tech stack, news events. No more spreadsheets to chase basic context.

AC
Acme Cloud Storage
SaaS · Series C · 1.2K employees
Enriched
Founded
2014
HQ
Austin, TX
Funding
$240M
Last news
3 days ago
Auto-enriched from 12 sources
Learn more

Policy Management

Full lifecycle from draft to retirement. Immutable PolicyVersion records lock published content for your auditor.

Information Security PolicyPublished
v1.0Jan 2024
v1.1Mar 2024
v2.0Sep 2024
v2.1Apr 2026
Learn more

Risk Register

Inherent and residual scoring, owner SLAs, control linkage, and matrix locks when active risks exist.

Risk register42 active
Likelihood →↑ Impact
Learn more

Internal Assessments

Structured questionnaires aligned to controls. AI-scored, reviewer-validated, auto-generates risks on failures.

SOC 2 — Annual87% complete
Passed
142
Failed
8
Open
14
Learn more

Subcontractor Insights

Map your fourth-party dependencies. See which sub-processors your critical vendors rely on — and where your concentration risk really lives.

Fourth-party concentration247 vendors
AWS
247 vendors
High
Stripe
89 vendors
Med
Twilio
63 vendors
Med
Datadog
41 vendors
Low
Learn more
Defensible edge · Posture Divergence Detection

When the questionnaire and live exposure disagree, you find out first.

Three-layer scoring on every vendor — Business Criticality, Assessed Posture, and Live External Exposure. When the gap exceeds threshold, divergence fires automatically: the parent risk record updates, a remediation task is generated, and your owners get notified before the next reassessment cycle.

Three layers, one score
Severity tiered alerts
Auto-routes to owners

No competitor markets this today. Drata's Agentic TPRM evaluates vendor evidence against criteria but doesn't reconcile against live signals. Black Kite and Bitsight measure external posture but not assessed posture. We sit at the intersection.

AC
Acme Cloud Storage
Tier 1 · Cloud infrastructure
Severe divergence
Business criticality88/100
Assessed posture87/100
Live external exposure42/100
Posture Divergence Detection
Δ 45 pts

Reported posture is strong (87) but live exposure degraded to 42. Reassessment fired automatically.

Parent risk record updated · remediation task assigned to David Chen
Meet Effy

Your GRC engineering colleague, not another chatbot.

Effy is the AI partner sitting beside your GRC team — drafting policies, reconciling vendor signals, answering questionnaires with cited evidence, and routing decisions to the right human. Twelve specialist agents on one shared data model, every tool call audit-logged.

VendorAssessmentRiskPolicyQuestionnaireEvidence
12
Specialist agents
53
Tools across GRC + TPRM
100%
Tool calls audit-logged
Effy
Your GRC colleague
Online
Draft the SOC 2 access review policy and tag every related control.

Drafted in policy library. Linked to CC6.1, CC6.2, CC6.3. Routed to David for approval.

Drafted7 sources cited2.1s
Which Tier 1 vendors are showing posture divergence this week?

3 Tier 1 vendors with active divergence:

Acme Cloud Storage
Δ 45Severe
Helix Analytics
Δ 18Moderate
Bluestack Logistics
Δ 9Minor
Ask Effy anything…
Frameworks

Every framework your auditor asks for, pre-seeded.

Ten frameworks shipped out of the box, plus your own. Cross-framework control mapping reduces evidence collection across overlapping audits.

SOC
SOC 2
Trust Services Criteria
ISO
ISO 27001
Information Security 2022
NIST
NIST CSF
Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
NIST
NIST 800-53
Rev 5 · 298 controls
CIS
CIS v8.1
Critical Security Controls
PCI
PCI DSS
v4.0.1 · Card data protection
HIPAA
HIPAA
Security Rule · PHI
GDPR
GDPR
EU personal data protection
NYDFS
NYDFS 500
23 NYCRR · NY financial
NYSDOH
NYSDOH 405.46
10 NYCRR · NY hospital
Custom frameworks
Bring your own controls and evidence requirements.
Integrity stack
Enforced top-to-bottom in the data layer
  • 01AUDITOR role
    Read-only enforced in the database — not a UI permission toggle
  • 02Immutable PolicyVersion
    Locked at publish — drafts and approved-but-unpublished stay separate
  • 03Tenant isolation
    getGrcOrgFilter enforced server-side — query-level, not config
  • 04AuditLog + soft-delete
    Every mutation logged; audit-significant records never hard-deleted
Defensible to your examiner — not just your auditor
Defensible edge · Auditor-grade by architecture

Integrity is a property of the data layer, not a config setting.

Most platforms enforce auditor-grade behavior through RBAC configuration that admins can change. We enforce it architecturally — at the database query layer, in the schema, in the code path. An admin cannot accidentally weaken the guarantees, and an examiner can verify them in the codebase.

Most competitors implement this via RBAC settings that admins can mutate. Ours is structural — verified in the codebase, enforced server-side, immutable at the data layer.

AI Safety

AI you can trust with your audit.

Compliance work is too important for a black box. Effy is built around responsible AI practices that keep humans in control, answers traceable, and your data exactly where it belongs.

A human approves every change

AI drafts. AI suggests. AI never ships changes on its own. A reviewer signs off before a policy publishes, a vendor score updates, or a questionnaire goes back to the customer.

Every answer cites its source

When the AI drafts a response, it shows you which policy, control, or evidence file it came from. No invented facts, no hidden reasoning, no surprise answers in front of an auditor.

Your data stays your data

Your evidence, policies, and vendor information are scoped to your organization at every layer. We don't train on your data, share it across tenants, or send it to public model providers.

You can pause or undo at any time

Conservative defaults across the platform. Reviewers can override AI scores, retract drafted answers, and roll back any AI suggestion before it reaches a published artifact.

Our AI safety checklist
Built into the platform · not an afterthought
  • Reviewer signs off on every change
  • Citations attached to every answer
  • Tenant-isolated evidence retrieval
  • Conservative defaults · undoable actions
  • Full activity log · always exportable
  • AUDITOR role read-only by design
You can see what the AI did, and why.
Why Thirdsentry

Six reasons GRC teams pick us.

We're not the cheapest. We're not the biggest. We are the platform built by people who've sat in the audit room — for teams who can't afford to get this wrong.

Built by operators

Designed by GRC managers, audit veterans, and AI engineers who've lived the work — not by generalists guessing at what compliance teams need.

Workflows that mirror real work

Audit cycles, vendor cycles, and questionnaire cycles flow the way they actually move in your team. No retraining your process to fit our software.

Support that acts like part of your team

Dedicated success managers from day one. Slack channel access. We sit next to you in audit prep — not behind a ticket queue.

Auditor-grade by architecture

AUDITOR role read-only at the data layer. Immutable PolicyVersion records. Full activity log on every action. Defensible to your examiner, not just your auditor.

One data model, not two

Internal posture and vendor posture share the same controls, evidence, and audit trail. Cross-domain correlation built in — Effy works across both.

Predictable pricing

Flat fee. Unlimited users. AI included. Framework expansion is the growth axis — never seat count or AI add-ons that turn renewal into a fight.

Latest Insights

Expert perspectives on vendor security and risk management

FAQ

Questions, answered.

Ready when you are

Run GRC and vendor risk on one platform.

30-minute walkthrough on your data model. See Effy answer real questionnaires and surface live posture divergence end-to-end.